In a situation where a caseworker finds an unsafe home during a visit (e.g., no food in the house, access to drugs, parent under the influence, no one in the home capable of caring), and the family is unable or unwilling to make a plan, an immediate meeting is called to consider a removal of the child to foster care.
Within 15 minutes of notification, a Zoom meeting is scheduled. Those in attendance include: the caseworker and supervisor from the CPS team working with the family; supervisors from foster care intake, Preventive unit, and Homefinding teams; representatives from CPS management and the investigation team; an attorney from the CFS Law Department; and administrators from Child Protective Services Investigations (CPSI) and Child Protective Services Management (CPSM).
“Prior to the pandemic,” explained Merkel, “it was a challenge to get everyone in the room. Zoom united our locations and streamlined the process to better ensure the safety of the child.”
Ground rules are set for the case review: No names, no addresses, no zip codes, no names of preventive services or any other information that could reveal the identity, location, race or ethnicity of the child and family involved. The importance of being blind ensures the meeting is focused only on safety issues for the child.
“I’ve been working with the county for 35 years,” Merkel said, “so there’s a chance I or one of my coworkers may know the family, maybe the grandparents. With the Blind Removal Process, we’re not bringing any judgments to the table about families we’ve worked with in the past.”
She explained that the meetings have offered a key opportunity to address the impact of bias, not just in regard to race and ethnicity, but also against families who have had frequent or multigenerational involvement in the child welfare system. “Through the Blind Removal Process, we have learned the importance of addressing personal bias and creating a cultural to have those open discussions.”
What is shared with the team is the current situation and any pertinent information about the family’s history. Any immediate or pending safety issues are evaluated and any potential placements with relatives are exhausted.
If a consensus is reached that the child is unable to be maintained safely at home and a removal to foster care is warranted, anyone who does not need first-hand knowledge of the family is asked to exit the Zoom call. The remaining team members go unblind, revealing the names, zip code and ethnicity of the child and family. The caseworker, Homefinding, foster care intake and legal team members jump into planning mode to talk about the next steps.
“The Blind Removal Process has also had some unintended benefits (to the child and family involved),” said Merkel. “Sometimes we are able to locate other family members or connect the family to resources as a result of our exhaustive search efforts, so the process doesn’t always lead to foster care placement.”